[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: objectIdentifierMatch on ambiguous name

To: Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>
Subject: Re: objectIdentifierMatch on ambiguous name
From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 13:25:42 -0800
Cc: ietf-ldapbis@OpenLDAP.org
In-reply-to: <HBF.20030212mvxa@bombur.uio.no>
References: <5.2.0.9.0.20030212122738.02451800@127.0.0.1> <5.2.0.9.0.20030212061344.023fce88@127.0.0.1> <HBF.20030211yoh0@bombur.uio.no> <5.2.0.9.0.20030210133220.0276c098@127.0.0.1> <5.2.0.9.0.20030210121802.01a5c210@127.0.0.1> <HBF.20030106vvho@bombur.uio.no> <5.2.0.9.0.20030104080644.02575450@127.0.0.1> <5.2.0.9.0.20030103160119.024dab60@127.0.0.1> <5.2.0.9.0.20030103120045.024457a8@127.0.0.1> <5.2.0.9.0.20030102084017.01d16830@127.0.0.1> <HBF.20030102wumy@bombur.uio.no> <5.2.0.9.0.20030103071943.031255d8@127.0.0.1> <3E15E938.E1B21014@sun.com> <HBF.20030103yquk@bombur.uio.no> <HBF.20030104hke6@bombur.uio.no> <5.2.0.9.0.20030118110326.01a04220@127.0.0.1> <HBF.20030210yzjd@bombur.uio.no> <5.2.0.9.0.20030211165224.01a057f0@127.0.0.1> <HBF.20030212o5mj@bombur.uio.no> <5.2.0.9.0.20030212122738.02451800@127.0.0.1>

Okay, taking this on somewhat incrementally.  How about
we replace the last paragraph of 1.3 (leaving my previous
addition to 6.2 in place) the following?

  While the <descr> form is generally preferred, the <numericoid>
  form should be used when an unambiguous short name (descriptor) is
  not available.  When the <descr> form is used, the representation              
  SHALL be considered invalid if the implementation cannot determine
  unambiguously which object identifier the <descr> refers to.

  See Section 6.2 for additional discussion of Short Names (descriptors).

Does this cover your [Models] concerns?

Kurt

Follow-Ups:
- Re: objectIdentifierMatch on ambiguous name
  - From: Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>

References:
- Re: objectIdentifierMatch on ambiguous name
  - From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
- Re: objectIdentifierMatch on ambiguous name
  - From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
- Re: objectIdentifierMatch on ambiguous name
  - From: Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>
- Re: objectIdentifierMatch on ambiguous name
  - From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
- Re: objectIdentifierMatch on ambiguous name
  - From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
- Re: objectIdentifierMatch on ambiguous name
  - From: Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>
- Re: objectIdentifierMatch on ambiguous name
  - From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
- Re: objectIdentifierMatch on ambiguous name
  - From: Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>
- Re: objectIdentifierMatch on ambiguous name
  - From: Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>

Prev by Date: Re: subschema semantics (Was: Models: Schema references to undefined entities)
Next by Date: Re: objectIdentifierMatch on ambiguous name
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread