[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
RE: Models: Matching Rule Uses
Why not? I may have an attribute who's syntax is caseExactMatch. I may
want to search for values of that attribute using an extensible match
filter where the rule is caseIgnoreMatch.
Jim
>>> "Ramsay, Ron" <Ron.Ramsay@ca.com> 1/30/03 4:30:59 PM >>>
caseIgnoreMatch is not an *extensible* matching rule.
-----Original Message-----
From: Hallvard B Furuseth [mailto:h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no]
Sent: Friday, 31 January 2003 09:34
To: ietf-ldapbis@OpenLDAP.org
Subject: Models: Matching Rule Uses
[Models] says:
> 4.1.4. Matching Rule Uses
>
> A matching rule use lists the attributes which are suitable for use
> with an extensible matching rule
Please add something like "(in addition to those uses expressed in
AttributeType descriptions)".
BTW, how do Matching Rule Uses relate to the statements in [Syntaxes]
about which matching rules can be used with which syntaxes?
For example, [Syntaxes] 5.2.6 says:
> The caseIgnoreMatch rule compares an assertion value of the
Directory
> String syntax to an attribute value of a syntax (e.g. the
Directory
> String, Printable String, Country String or Telephone Number
syntax)
> whose corresponding ASN.1 type is DirectoryString or one of its
> alternative string types, e.g. PrintableString.
--
Hallvard