Hallvard B Furuseth wrote:
[The message IDs only need to be reserved for 2MSL (for the same reason that TCP is supposed to wait that long for TIME_WAIT blocks to expire)]I don't think so. It has the effect that any definition of LDAP for a protocol which doesn't guarantee order, must reserve message IDs of abandoned operations until the next bind.
Oops. It must reserve the message IDs of abandoned operations, period. The server might receive the abandon after the bind.
Simon