draft-ietf-ldapbis-syntaxes-02: oid = descr / numericoid

[Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com>]

HI!

I'd like to propose a change to draft-ietf-ldapbis-syntaxes-02 since I 
noticed some problems with same OID textual descriptions being used for 
object classes and attribute types.

Current text:

------------------------------ snip ----------------------------
   When 'oid' elements occur in a value, the 'descr' notation option
   SHOULD be used in preference to the 'numericoid'.  An object
   descriptor is more readable than a numeric OBJECT IDENTIFIER, and a
   descriptor (where assigned and known by the implementation) SHOULD
   be used in preference to numeric oids to the greatest extent
   possible.  Examples of object descriptors in LDAP are attribute
   type, object class, and matching rule names.

      oid = descr / numericoid

------------------------------ snip ----------------------------

IMHO the other way round is better since it causes less grief on side of 
a schema-aware application:

   When 'oid' elements occur in a value, the 'numericoid' notation
   option SHOULD be used in preference to the 'descr'. An object
   descriptor might be ambigously used
   to specify an attribute type, an object class or a matching rule
   name.

Please excuse my poor English.

Ciao, Michael.