[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Object class subschema
HI!
Referring to section 6.2 of draft-ietf-ldapbis-syntaxes-02.txt:
---------------------- snip ---------------------
( 2.5.20.1 NAME 'subschema'
AUXILIARY
MAY ( dITStructureRules $
nameForms $
ditContentRules $
objectClasses $
attributeTypes $
matchingRules $
matchingRuleUse ) )
The ldapSyntaxes operational attribute can also be present in
subschema entries.
---------------------- snip ---------------------
What's the rationale behind not including attribute type
ldapSyntaxes in MAY expression?
Ciao, Michael.