RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ldapbis-protocol-06.txt

["Steven Legg" <steven.legg@adacel.com.au>]

Ron,

Ramsay, Ron wrote:
> If you want the SYNTAX part to be meaningful, you have to 
> refer to X.520,
> either by introducing the table with the reference (and then 
> making the
> names match those in X.520 exactly), or each paragraph 
> describing a syntax
> must have a reference. The latter would be better because 
> some attributes
> (audio) are not defined in X.520 and so their ASN.1 definition can be
> provided instead.

I'll be pursuing the latter strategy precisely because not all
LDAP syntaxes correspond to a handy ASN.1 type name from the 2nd
edition of X.520.

Regards,
Steven