[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

RE: ASN.1 definitions in draft-ietf-ldapbis-syntaxes-01.txt

To: <steven.legg@adacel.com.au>
Subject: RE: ASN.1 definitions in draft-ietf-ldapbis-syntaxes-01.txt
From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2002 16:57:06 -0800
Cc: "'Jim Sermersheim'" <JIMSE@novell.com>, <IETF-LDAPbis@OpenLDAP.org>
In-reply-to: <007f01c1c3df$08b2e670$a518200a@osmium.mtwav.adacel.com.au>
References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020304154941.03121e60@127.0.0.1>

At 04:45 PM 2002-03-04, Steven Legg wrote:
>Are you for or against adding an ASN.1 type definition for
>LDAP Syntax Description to RFC2252bis ?

For.  Every LDAP syntax should have a ASN.1 type definition
(in many cases it will be a constrained OCTET STRING).

I have no objection to the one you offer for LDAP Syntax Description.

Kurt

References:
- RE: ASN.1 definitions in draft-ietf-ldapbis-syntaxes-01.txt
  - From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
- RE: ASN.1 definitions in draft-ietf-ldapbis-syntaxes-01.txt
  - From: "Steven Legg" <steven.legg@adacel.com.au>

Prev by Date: RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ldapbis-protocol-06.txt
Next by Date: RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ldapbis-protocol-06.txt
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread