[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: ;binary
Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote:
>
> At 08:30 AM 2002-02-25, Christopher Oliva wrote:
> >
> > My argument here is that the current ldapv3 RFCs do not
> > really say one way or another what should happen.
>
> It doesn't need to. The specification requires the client to
> request the userCertificate attribute using ;binary. If the
> client fails this mandate, then the behavior it gets is undefined.
> [..]
Clients are expected to request the userCertificate attribute
using ;binary. Clients which fail to follow the specification
will not interoperate with all compliant servers.
Sorry for jumping in that late.
Hmm, now you're telling us that e.g. a generic client has to explicitly
request all attributes it might handle additionally with transfer encoding?
Ciao, Michael.
- References:
- RE: ;binary
- From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>