[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: NAMEd syntaxes in draft-ietf-ldapbis-syntaxes-00
Hi Kurt!
I'm a bit confused since adding the NAME was your idea.
In any case, I have no problem taking it out again.
Thanks,
Kathy Dally
"Kurt D. Zeilenga" wrote:
>
> This I-D extends LDAPv3 to support NAMEd LDAPsyntaxes. At
> first glance, I believe this would cause significant
> interoperability problems. Are there good reasons why support
> of NAMEd LDAPsyntaxes should not be viewed as a "new" feature?
>
> Kurt