[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
RE: implementation quiz: ;binary
Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote:
> Please provide a separate response for each application of
> interest. There is no need to respond if you have not
> implemented ;binary transfer of attribute types. This is
> only a partial quiz aimed at getting a general idea of the
> level of interoperability.
Implementor: Adacel Technologies
Application: View500
Application Class: [ ] client, [X] server
> Have you implemented ;binary transfer of attributes?
Yes.
> Is this support specific to particular syntaxes and/or attributes?
> If so, which syntaxes and attributes?
No. All supported syntaxes can be ;binary transferred.
> Do you support non-;binary transfer for any syntax and/or
> attribute which you support ;binary transfer for?
Yes. Each syntax with an LDAP string encoding can also be
transferred as ;binary.
> Does your application ensure values it sends using ;binary are
> restricted to a valid BER encoding of the attribute's syntax?
Yes.
> Does your application treat non-BER encoded values received
> using ;binary as an error? If so, what error?
Yes, invalidAttributeSyntax.
> Does your application treat BER encoding of values of incorrect
> using ;binary as an error? If so, what error?
Yes, invalidAttributeSyntax.
> Does your application expect values to be encoded using a
> subset of BER? If so, which subset?
No. Any legal BER encoding according to X.690 is accepted.
>
> Comments:
>
>