[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: implementation quiz: ;binary
"Kurt D. Zeilenga" wrote:
>
> Please provide a separate response for each application of
> interest. There is no need to respond if you have not
> implemented ;binary transfer of attribute types. This is
> only a partial quiz aimed at getting a general idea of the
> level of interoperability.
>
> Implementor: Innosoft
> Application: Innosoft Distributed Directory Server 4.x
> Application Class: [ ] client, [x] server
>
> Have you implemented ;binary transfer of attributes?
Yes
> Is this support specific to particular syntaxes and/or attributes?
> If so, which syntaxes and attributes?
Yes, for the certificates and revocation lists.
> Do you support non-;binary transfer for any syntax and/or
> attribute which you support ;binary transfer for?
No.
> Does your application ensure values it sends using ;binary are
> restricted to a valid BER encoding of the attribute's syntax?
No, it sends values which have been supplied by the client in earlier
Add or Modify calls.
> Does your application treat non-BER encoded values received
> using ;binary as an error? If so, what error?
No, the server does not enforce BER.
> Does your application treat BER encoding of values of incorrect
> using ;binary as an error? If so, what error?
I do not understand what is meant by "of values of incorrect using ;binary".
> Does your application expect values to be encoded using a
> subset of BER? If so, which subset?
No.
Mark Wahl
Sun Microsystems Inc.