[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: interoperability of ;binary
At 10:07 AM 4/3/01 -0400, Mark C Smith wrote:
>"Kurt D. Zeilenga" wrote:
>>
>> In this particular case, I suggest we consider removing the
>> ";binary" transfer option from the specification and all
>> schema elements dependent on it, including: certificate,
>> userCertificate, and strongAuthenticationUser. Then I suggest
>> reintroduction of these schema elements with alternative
>> string encodings as was done for LDAPv2 (RFC 2559).
>
>A string encoding of a certificate is not useful unless it is fully
>reversible without loss (because PKI applications need access to the
>original DER certificate).
Which is what RFC 2559 provides for LDAPv2, no options required.
-- Kurt