[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: quick URL implementation report quiz
For OpenLDAP 2.0 (or current release):
At 07:26 AM 3/29/01 -0800, Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote:
>(the URL are examples, not test cases)
>
>Does your implementation support IPv6 literal addresses?
> ldap://[2222::1]
Yes.
>Does your implementation support not processing an URL
>with an unrecognized critical extension?
A better example:
ldap:///????!foobar
Yes.
>In particular, when returned by a server in a referral
>or search continuation?
Yes.
>Does your implementation support the bindname extension?
> ldap:///??sub??bindname=cn=Bar%2co=Foo
No.