Sounds
reasonable. I'll forget about the two earlier suggestions. >>> "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org> 11/16/00 12:35:09 PM >>> At 11:35 AM 11/16/00 -0700, Jim Sermersheim wrote: >I'm wondering, in general, what changes can or should be made to any ASN.1 constructs in the bis documents. I would assume minimal if any at all. I believe we must be very leery of changing the ASN.1. >Specifically, I've noticed the following in RFC 2251 (none of which are "real" problems): Unless there is a "real" problem, the ASN.1 should not be changed. Kurt |