[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Syntax descriptions in RFC2252
RFC 2252 lists 57 syntaxes in the table in 4.3.2. = It proceeds to give
descriptions of varying detail for 32 of those = syntaxes in section 6.
Should the other 25 syntaxes be given descriptions or = be removed
from the table, or just left alone?
Should any new syntaxes be added? Case Ignore = String and
Case Exact String come to mind.
The last paragraph of section 4.3.2 (after the = table) discusses the
optional upper bound field to be added to an instance = of the
syntax usage. Would it be useful to add an = optional lower bound
value also. For example, it could be = written as
"1.3.6.4.1.1466.0{ll..uu}, where = 'll' refers to the optional lower bound,
and 'uu' refers to the optional upper bound. If = only one value is
present, it would refer to the upper bound.
Thought?
Mark