>>>> Mark Wahl <Mark.Wahl@sun.com> 11/14/00 4:30:07 PM
>>>
> >> Basically I've moved "tags" to "tagged" before elements (only to clarify), and >> changed SEQUENCE to PDU (because I think it really means any
SEQUENCE, SET, or
>> CHOICE). > >> Does anyone see a problem with this? > >Yes. > >1. LDAP has no SET, only SET OF. Right.
>2. I don't think you mean to ignore a unrecognized tag in a CHOICE. I was thinking of future versions allowing additional authentication
choices, but your right, ignoring unknown choices here wouldn't be correct. The
search filter is also a choice, and I suppose some kind of semantics could be
assigned to the case where an unknown tag is present in a set following an
and or or. I'll just ignore that possibility for now and move on.
>That is why I said SEQUENCE.
Aside from the SEQUENCE vs. SEQUENCE and CHOICE issue, does moving the word "tag" help or hinder? Jim
|