[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: Progression of normative references
At 09:36 AM 8/9/00 +0200, Leif Johansson wrote:
>> Of course, we still must deal with dozen or so normative
>> references to LDAPv2 and X.500 RFCs.
>
>Did we reach a consensus on removing the X.500 references
>and writing up the LDAP information model independent of X.500?
I believe there was general consensus that references to X.500
documents should be more specific.
I was actually referring to the various references to X.500
RFCs (ie: non-LDAP specific) such as RFC 1274 which need either
be progressed, cut, or absorbed.
Kurt