[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: syncrepl inseard of back-perl ?
"Brett @Google" <brett.maxfield@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 5:43 PM, Dieter Kluenter <dieter@dkluenter.de> wrote:
>> SATOH Fumiyasu <fumiyas@osstech.jp> writes:
>>
>>> At Mon, 28 Sep 2009 01:39:32 +1000,
>>> Brett @Google wrote:
>> [...]
[...]
> This would seem reasonable complexity wise, but i was wondering, is
> there any way to skip the refresh phase, other in just ignoring the
> objects, waiting for the persist stage ?
[...]
An example based on ldapsearch:
ldapsearch -E'!sync=ro/rid=042,csn=20090928054615.449093Z#000000#000#000000'
-H ldap://localhost -b dc=example,dc=com -s sub "*" +
As a result you either get a sync done control, that is no
modification to the database
control: 1.3.6.1.4.1.4203.1.9.1.3 false MIQAAAADAQH/
or you get a syncInfo, a sync state control, the modified entries and
an new cookie.
-Dieter
--
Dieter Klünter | Systemberatung
http://dkluenter.de
GPG Key ID:8EF7B6C6
53°37'09,95"N
10°08'02,42"E