[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
memberUID vs. uniqueMember
Hello all,
I've done an authentication migration to an OpenLDAP based system
running on a RedHat based Linux system.
All is well except one thing: secondary group membership is not taken
into account, e.g. when needed to access files/dirs.
My understanding is that the secondary group membership should be based
on the uniqueMember rather than the memberUID (deprecated).
If I use the memberUID for group membership everything works as expected
but when I use uniqueMember funny things happen:
1. 'id' shows only the primary group
while 'id <username>' works as expected
2. the secondary group membership is not taken into account
until I do a specific newgrp <secondary_group>
(logging in/out is not the issue here)
I wonder if this is a bug or a misconfiguration in e.g. /etc/ldap.conf (or pam)
E.g. is the following setting important ?
pam_member_attribute uniquemember
(makes no difference as far as I can tell, anyway)
Should I move to memberUID --- AFAIK deprecated ?
I couldn't find any clear answer on the web, etc.
TIA for any answer.
--
Ryurick M. Hristev mailto:ryurick.hristev@canterbury.ac.nz
Computer Systems Manager
University of Canterbury, Physics & Astronomy Dept., New Zealand