Re: Serious Concurrency problem with openldap-2.0.X

["Michel.Minsoul" <Michel.Minsoul@ulg.ac.be>]

2.0.21 without thread DOES NOT EQUAL 2.0.22.
2.0.21 without thread CANNOT process search queries concurrently.


> Em Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 09:52:28AM +0100, Michel.Minsoul escreveu:
> > I have tested openldap-2.0.22 and it seems to work. I could not reproduce
> > the concurrency problem I had with openldap-2.0.21. Thanks for fixing this
> > bug rapidly.
> > 
> > Just one more question. It seems that the new giant lock prevents any
> > entry from being read while a given entry is being updated. It would be
> 
> Just a question, what would be better then regarding this behaviour: compile openldap without
> threads or upgrade to 2.0.22? I.e., this "giant lock" behaviour in .22 would
> be the same as if 2.0.21 was compiled without threads, right?
> 
> 

Michel MINSOUL 
SEGI, University of Liege
B26 - Sart Tilman
B-4000 Liege (Belgium)
mailto: Michel.Minsoul@ulg.ac.be 
VOICE: +32 (4) 3664977    
FAX:   +32 (4) 3662920