[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: Slave-SLAPD dies - Possible BUG?!?
Hi,
I digged deeper in that problem. Here is my description:
The setup: A master with one replog entry and one replica entry. Software:
Openldap 1.2.7 with SuSE 6.3.
Problem: Slave SLAPD dies after replication.
Cause: If you do regular (1st example) or irregular (2nd example) modifications
of the master database to one attribute that is indexed (I tried it with
sub,eq,pres and with eq,pres and with eq), the slave SLAPD dies during
replication of SLURPD. It dies directly after opening the index DBB (according
to log file with loglevel 255). If you comment the index entry (which you want
to write to) at the slave SLAPD out, everything is fine.
It is reproducable.
1st example:
DN....
-cn
+cn= Givenname Surname
2nd example:
DN....
-cn
-cn
+cn= Givenname Surname
Am Don, 06 Apr 2000 schrieben Sie:
> I'm using replication with OpenLDAP 1.2.9 without any problems, but
> I only have one replica. Our environment puts a very heavy load on
> the slapd processes.
>
> However, the last time I had a problem like this was when I made an
> illegal change to the database (with schemacheck off) and it killed
> both the master and the replicas.
>
> Randy
>
>
> > Stephan Mueller wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have an Master-LDAP with 4 replicas. SLURPD runs in Daemon-mode. Replication
> > > works. Problem: when I do more than nearly 20 modifications within one DN the
> > > repication process kills the Slave-SLAPDs. That means: ps ax shows no
> > > SLAPD-processes. It is reproducable.
> > >
> > > What went wrong.
> > >
> >
> > I don't know. I only want to say that yesterday I had the same problem on RedHat
> > 6.0
> > with openldap 1.2.9:(
> >
> > --
> > Dmitry Melekhov
> > http://www.aspec.ru/~dm
> > 2:5050/11.23@fidonet
> >
> >
> >
> >
--
Stephan Müller Stephan.Mueller@suse.de
SuSE München GmbH phone +49 (0) 89 42769-0
Stahlgruberring 28 fax +49 (0) 89 42017701
D-81829 München mobile +49 (0) 179 6978712
http://www.suse.de http://www.suse.com
>>> Wer Rechtschreibfehler findet, darf sie behalten. <<<