Re: Please test RE_24

[Aaron Richton <richton@nbcs.rutgers.edu>]

test039 -b bdb, under watchmalloc so this in theory is The Actual Instruction:

(dbx) threads
      t@1  a  l@1   ?()   LWP suspended in  __lwp_wait()
      t@2  a  l@2   slapd_daemon_task()   LWP suspended in  _libc_poll()
      t@3  a  l@3   ldap_int_thread_pool_wrapper()   LWP suspended in  attr_index_name_cmp() 
o>    t@4  a  l@4   ldap_int_thread_pool_wrapper()   signal SIGSEGV in  _ti_pthread_mutex_unlock()
      t@5  a  l@5   ldap_int_thread_pool_wrapper()   sleep on 0xffffffff7f304650  in  __lwp_park()
      t@6  a  l@6   ldap_int_thread_pool_wrapper()   sleep on 0xffffffff7f304650  in  __lwp_park()
      t@7  a  l@7   ldap_int_thread_pool_wrapper()   sleep on 0xffffffff7f304650  in  __lwp_park()
      t@8  a  l@8   ldap_int_thread_pool_wrapper()   sleep on 0xffffffff7f304650  in  __lwp_park()
      t@9  a  l@9   ldap_int_thread_pool_wrapper()   LWP suspended in  match_re_C()
     t@10  a l@10   ldap_int_thread_pool_wrapper()   sleep on 0xffffffff7f304650  in  __lwp_park()
     t@11  a l@11   ldap_int_thread_pool_wrapper()   sleep on 0x10056ac10  in  __lwp_park()
     t@12  a l@12   ldap_int_thread_pool_wrapper()   sleep on 0xffffffff7f304650  in  __lwp_park()
     t@13  a l@13   ldap_int_thread_pool_wrapper()   sleep on 0xffffffff7f304650  in  __lwp_park()
     t@14  a l@14   ldap_int_thread_pool_wrapper()   sleep on 0xffffffff7f304650  in  __lwp_park()
     t@15  a l@15   ldap_int_thread_pool_wrapper()   LWP suspended in  _ti_pthread_mutex_lock()
     t@16  a l@16   ldap_int_thread_pool_wrapper()   sleep on 0x10053dcb0  in  __lwp_park()
     t@17  a l@17   ldap_int_thread_pool_wrapper()   LWP suspended in  ordered_value_validate()
     t@18  a l@18   ldap_int_thread_pool_wrapper()   LWP suspended in  copy_pattern() 
(dbx) where
current thread: t@4
  [1] _ti_pthread_mutex_unlock(0x10053df90, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0), at 0xffffffff7dd1493c 
=>[2] ldap_pvt_thread_mutex_unlock(mutex = 0x10053df90), line 307 in "thr_posix.c"
  [3] ldap_back_getconn(op = 0x1005d0990, rs = 0xffffffff78bff998, sendok = 18, binddn = 0xffffffff78bfe5e8, bindcred = 0xffffffff78bfe5d8), line 912 in "bind.c"
  [4] ldap_back_dobind_int(lcp = 0xffffffff78bfe8f8, op = 0x1005d0990, rs = 0xffffffff78bff998, sendok = 18, retries = 0, dolock = 1), line 1267 in "bind.c"
  [5] ldap_back_dobind(lcp = 0xffffffff78bfe8f8, op = 0x1005d0990, rs = 0xffffffff78bff998, sendok = LDAP_BACK_SENDERR), line 1508 in "bind.c"
  [6] ldap_back_search(op = 0x1005d0990, rs = 0xffffffff78bff998), line 166 in "search.c"
  [7] glue_sub_search(op = 0x1005d0990, rs = 0xffffffff78bff998, b0 = 0xffffffff78bfeda8, on = 0x1005389e0), line 340 in "backglue.c"
  [8] glue_op_search(op = 0x1005d0990, rs = 0xffffffff78bff998), line 452 in "backglue.c"
  [9] overlay_op_walk(op = 0x1005d0990, rs = 0xffffffff78bff998, which = op_search, oi = 0x100538800, on = 0x1005389e0), line 642 in "backover.c"
  [10] over_op_func(op = 0x1005d0990, rs = 0xffffffff78bff998, which = op_search), line 704 in "backover.c"
  [11] over_op_search(op = 0x1005d0990, rs = 0xffffffff78bff998), line 726 in "backover.c"
  [12] fe_op_search(op = 0x1005d0990, rs = 0xffffffff78bff998), line 368 in "search.c"
  [13] overlay_op_walk(op = 0x1005d0990, rs = 0xffffffff78bff998, which = op_search, oi = 0x10053c6b0, on = (nil)), line 652 in "backover.c"
  [14] over_op_func(op = 0x1005d0990, rs = 0xffffffff78bff998, which = op_search), line 704 in "backover.c"
  [15] over_op_search(op = 0x1005d0990, rs = 0xffffffff78bff998), line 726 in "backover.c"
  [16] do_search(op = 0x1005d0990, rs = 0xffffffff78bff998), line 217 in "search.c"
  [17] connection_operation(ctx = 0xffffffff78bffc28, arg_v = 0x1005d0990), line 1083 in "connection.c"
  [18] connection_read_thread(ctx = 0xffffffff78bffc28, argv = 0xd), line 1210 in "connection.c"
  [19] ldap_int_thread_pool_wrapper(xpool = 0x1004f2ad0), line 625 in "tpool.c"


I can tar up the testrun directory (or the entire source tree) if 
interested.