[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: (ITS#7616) syncrepl enhancement: defer requests when refreshing
- To: openldap-its@OpenLDAP.org
- Subject: Re: (ITS#7616) syncrepl enhancement: defer requests when refreshing
- From: hyc@symas.com
- Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 15:59:45 GMT
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated (OpenLDAP-ITS)
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------050807020608030505070800
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
hyc@symas.com wrote:
> Michael Ströder wrote:
>> hyc@symas.com wrote:
>>> I was considering returning LDAP_BUSY for this case, but it may make more
>>> sense to return a REFERRAL to the provider instead. (Although again, if we
>>> have two MMR servers pointed at each other starting at the same time, they
>>> would just refer to each other and clients would get nowhere until one of them
>>> finishes its refresh.)
>>
>> IMO referrals are harmful.
>> Just returning LDAP_BUSY seems best to me because if reliable HA is really
>> important for a deployment you have decent load-balancers in front of your
>> LDAP server which should do a proper health-check.
The attached patch should provide the desired behavior. It needs more testing
though.
--
-- Howard Chu
CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/
--------------050807020608030505070800
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8;
name="diff.txt"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename="diff.txt"
diff --git a/servers/slapd/syncrepl.c b/servers/slapd/syncrepl.c
index 9b5c0f3..4ea8a70 100644
--- a/servers/slapd/syncrepl.c
+++ b/servers/slapd/syncrepl.c
@@ -148,6 +148,8 @@ static int syncrepl_add_glue_ancestors(
/* delta-mmr overlay handler */
static int syncrepl_op_modify( Operation *op, SlapReply *rs );
+static int syncrepl_op_search( Operation *op, SlapReply *rs );
+
/* callback functions */
static int dn_callback( Operation *, SlapReply * );
static int nonpresent_callback( Operation *, SlapReply * );
@@ -216,16 +218,14 @@ init_syncrepl(syncinfo_t *si)
if ( !syncrepl_ov.on_bi.bi_type ) {
syncrepl_ov.on_bi.bi_type = "syncrepl";
syncrepl_ov.on_bi.bi_op_modify = syncrepl_op_modify;
+ syncrepl_ov.on_bi.bi_op_search = syncrepl_op_search;
overlay_register( &syncrepl_ov );
}
- /* delta-MMR needs the overlay, nothing else does.
- * This must happen before accesslog overlay is configured.
- */
- if ( si->si_syncdata &&
- !overlay_is_inst( si->si_be, syncrepl_ov.on_bi.bi_type )) {
+ if (!overlay_is_inst( si->si_be, syncrepl_ov.on_bi.bi_type )) {
overlay_config( si->si_be, syncrepl_ov.on_bi.bi_type, -1, NULL, NULL );
- if ( !ad_reqMod ) {
+ /* delta-MMR needs this. Must happen before accesslog overlay is configured. */
+ if ( si->si_syncdata && !ad_reqMod ) {
const char *text;
logschema *ls = &accesslog_sc;
@@ -1179,6 +1179,7 @@ do_syncrep2(
} else {
rc = -2;
}
+ si->si_refreshDone = 1;
goto done;
case LDAP_RES_INTERMEDIATE:
@@ -2164,6 +2165,31 @@ syncrepl_op_modify( Operation *op, SlapReply *rs )
}
static int
+syncrepl_op_search( Operation *op, SlapReply *rs )
+{
+ slap_overinst *on = (slap_overinst *)op->o_bd->bd_info;
+ syncinfo_t *si;
+
+ /* Allow syncrepl internal searches */
+ if ( op->o_conn->c_conn_idx == -1 )
+ return SLAP_CB_CONTINUE;
+
+ /* Check if any of our consumers are refreshing */
+ for ( si = op->o_bd->be_syncinfo; si; si = si->si_next ) {
+ /* If we have some state, allow other consumers to progress */
+ if ( si->si_cookieState->cs_num > 0 &&
+ op->o_sync > SLAP_CONTROL_IGNORED )
+ return SLAP_CB_CONTINUE;
+ /* If we have any consumer refreshing, reject searches */
+ if ( !si->si_refreshDone ) {
+ send_ldap_error( op, rs, LDAP_BUSY, "syncrepl refresh in progress" );
+ return rs->sr_err;
+ }
+ }
+ return SLAP_CB_CONTINUE;
+}
+
+static int
syncrepl_message_to_op(
syncinfo_t *si,
Operation *op,
--------------050807020608030505070800--