[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: (ITS#6997) Segmentation fault when using slapo-rwm and slapo-chain
> Full_Name: Manuel Gaupp
> Version: 2.4.26
> OS: Linux 2.6.18 (CentOS 5.6 x86_64)
> URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/
> Submission from: (NULL) (93.208.112.253)
>
>
> Under the following circumstances OpenLDAP crashes when a chained search
> does not return with result code 0:
> - "rwm" overlay used in a global context
> - "chain" overlay used in a database specifix context
>
> (gdb) bt
> #0 0x0000000400040004 in ?? ()
> #1 0x000000000042e5c7 in slap_cleanup_play (op=0x197834b0, rs=0x42a07ca0)
> at result.c:539
> #2 0x000000000042ef9b in send_ldap_response (op=0x197834b0,
> rs=0x42a07ca0)
> at result.c:724
> #3 0x000000000042fcf9 in slap_send_ldap_result (op=0x197834b0,
> rs=0x42a07ca0) at result.c:851
> #4 0x00000000004d982a in ldap_chain_response (op=0x197834b0,
> rs=0x42a07ca0) at chain.c:1165
> #5 0x00000000004820ca in over_back_response (op=0x197834b0,
> rs=0x42a07ca0)
> at backover.c:237
> #6 0x000000000042e535 in slap_response_play (op=0x197834b0,
> rs=0x42a07ca0)
> at result.c:505
> #7 0x000000000042ef78 in send_ldap_response (op=0x197834b0,
> rs=0x42a07ca0)
> at result.c:579
> #8 0x000000000042fcf9 in slap_send_ldap_result (op=0x197834b0,
> rs=0x42a07ca0) at result.c:851
> #9 0x00000000004928f0 in bdb_search (op=0x197834b0, rs=0x42a07ca0)
> at search.c:499
> #10 0x0000000000482352 in overlay_op_walk (op=0x197834b0, rs=0x42a07ca0,
> which=op_search, oi=0x196f3bb0, on=0x0) at backover.c:671
> #11 0x00000000004828b7 in over_op_func (op=0x197834b0, rs=0x42a07ca0,
> which=op_search) at backover.c:723
> #12 0x0000000000421cf9 in fe_op_search (op=0x197834b0, rs=0x42a07ca0)
> at search.c:402
> #13 0x0000000000482352 in overlay_op_walk (op=0x197834b0, rs=0x42a07ca0,
> which=op_search, oi=0x1970fd30, on=0x0) at backover.c:671
> #14 0x00000000004828b7 in over_op_func (op=0x197834b0, rs=0x42a07ca0,
> which=op_search) at backover.c:723
> #15 0x0000000000422505 in do_search (op=0x197834b0, rs=0x42a07ca0)
> at search.c:247
> #16 0x000000000041fa95 in connection_operation (ctx=0x42a07d70,
> arg_v=<value optimized out>) at connection.c:1138
> #17 0x0000000000503d5c in ldap_int_thread_pool_wrapper (xpool=0x196beee0)
> at tpool.c:685
> #18 0x000000316820673d in start_thread () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
> #19 0x0000003167ad44bd in clone () from /lib64/libc.so.6
>
> OpenLDAP 2.4.26 was built using:
> ./configure --enable-rewrite --enable-ldap --enable-rwm --enable-bdb
>
> This issue can be reproduced using the following configuration
> (referred as 'slapd.conf.proxy')
> ------------------------------------------
> overlay rwm
> # There might be some rewrite directives
> database bdb
> suffix "o=example"
> rootdn "cn=admin,o=example"
> rootpw secret
> directory /root/db.proxy
> overlay chain
> chain-return-error true
> chain-uri "ldap://localhost:38977"
> ------------------------------------------
> The process is started on port 389 with plain ldap
> /usr/local/libexec/slapd -f slapd.conf.proxy -h "ldap://localhost:389"
>
> Create the following entry in this server:
> dn: cn=ldap,o=example
> objectclass: extensibleObject
> objectclass: referral
> ref: ldap://localhost:38977/cn=real,o=example
>
> To reproduce the error there has to be another server where the referral
> points to. It contains the following minimal configuration:
> (referred as 'slapd.conf.server')
> ------------------------------------------
> database bdb
> suffix "cn=real,o=example"
> rootdn "cn=admin,cn=real,o=example"
> rootpw secret
> directory /root/db.server
> ------------------------------------------
> The process is started on port 38977 with plain ldap
> /usr/local/libexec/slapd -f slapd.conf.server -h "ldap://localhost:38977"
>
> Using the following ldapsearch, slapd crashes:
> ldapsearch -h localhost -p 389 -D "cn=admin,o=example" -w secret \
> -x -b "ou=abc,cn=ldap,o=example" 1.1
>
> Whereas the following ldapsearch returns with "success"
> ldapsearch -h localhost -p 389 -D "cn=admin,o=example" -w secret \
> -x -b "cn=ldap,o=example" 1.1
>
> Deactivating the "rwm" overlay prevents from this issue. So I think the
> problem can be found somewhere in the rwm sources.
I'm afraid that's unavoidable given the stacking order of the overlays.
This will likely be fixed only when ITS#6166 is addressed, i.e. in
OpenLDAP 2.5.
p.